tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640715116021555600.post1565692487251384350..comments2023-07-04T08:26:11.131-04:00Comments on Sleepy Eyed Whiners of the Deep: Updated: A Statist Reader Chimes In. I respond. You praise my greatness.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640715116021555600.post-65570002778855465642009-10-18T13:53:55.380-04:002009-10-18T13:53:55.380-04:00Jimmy gets schooled.<a href="http://sleepyeyedwhiners.blogspot.com/2009/10/dont-make-fun-of-south-reader-gets-my.html" rel="nofollow">Jimmy gets schooled.</a>Jayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17870722050000888929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640715116021555600.post-62743158522771678452009-10-18T11:14:08.271-04:002009-10-18T11:14:08.271-04:00Jimmy, you have ONE thing right in your comments, ...Jimmy, you have ONE thing right in your comments, I AM great.Jayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17870722050000888929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640715116021555600.post-43817288350568295562009-10-17T22:26:48.002-04:002009-10-17T22:26:48.002-04:00nice heading for this blog, after reading your res...nice heading for this blog, after reading your responses I have to say, you are indelibly great...accept for the fact that you're just another idiot protagonising the republican pitch to uneducated people around the country. and don't refute the fact that people residing in rural areas are more likely to vote republican and are, on the whole, less educated than people residing in urban environment. If you still aren't convinced, maybe we should look at the worst educated state in the US. Looks like this belongs to the great state of Mississippi. Looks like it's been a red state during every presidential election for the past 60 years. I suppose that could be a coincidence that has nothing to do with the education level of the registered voters. Well maybe the rest of the uneducated South can provide answers than, oh wait.<br />And don't tell me Reaganomics made America economically thriving. If that were true, and the residuals of such a successful economic policy carrying through Bush's administration, Bush would have never lost the 92' election based on the economy being in the tank. You surely cannot argue there was any greater factor to the defeat with Bush's approval rating so high after the quick and affective removal of Iraqi troops from Kuwait just a year earlier. And oh yeah, the following president only oversaw the greatest period of economic growth the world has ever seen. But surely that had nothing to do with Clinton's economic policy, it had to be coincidence, right.<br />But you are great, that's unquestionable.Jimmy from Nebraskanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640715116021555600.post-1079613895012171662009-10-17T04:12:14.836-04:002009-10-17T04:12:14.836-04:00Wow, a clever strategy, drunk Jared, cutting off a...Wow, a clever strategy, drunk Jared, cutting off all my lifelines, by so intelligently refuting them ahead of time.<br /><br />This is the first time I have EVER heard a leftist justify abortion by stating that it's good for Republicans. Ingenious! Bravo for you. However, I am unswayed. You see, I operate under the assumption that as people age, and gain intelligence, they trend conservative. So, of those 30 million, about 25 million will end up conservative anyway.<br /><br />The death penalty argument is one leftists always like to use to throw the charge of hypocrisy at conservatives. Of course, I go back and forth on my personal feelings on the death penalty. It was the subject of one of my first <br /><a href="http://sleepyeyedwhiners.blogspot.com/2007/11/evolving-on-death-penalty.html" rel="nofollow">blog posts</a>.<br /><br />But, I reject the equation of the taking of innocent life (as in the case of abortion) with the application of the death penalty to those who most certainly are not innocent. It would seem to be morally pure in either case, one would need to be pro-death penalty and pro-abortion, or anti-abortion and anti-death penalty. As in many life choices, it's just not always that simple.<br /><br />You haven't been reading this blog, have you. You make a lot of assumptions based on your false assumption that I am a Republican. I don't judge you, Jared (except I am starting to form some opinions about your cognitive abilities), so please don't impart views to me you haven't read.<br /><br />"Bush was opposed to powerful anti-Christian nations?" Huh? Iraq a powerful anti-Christian nation? Iraq was a secular nation ruled by a heinous dictator who killed hundreds of thousands of people, but had been ravaged by his own war against Iran, a previous war against the US, and years of sanctions. Hardly powerful.<br /><br />If we really wanted to oppose a <br />powerful anti-Christian nation, wouldn't Saudi Arabia have made a much better target? Or Syria? Or Iran? Please.<br /><br />What Nixonian statement are you talking about? I'm just wondering, because I am actually, not going to look for it. I will just say that this was LBJ's war, and, it ended under Nixon's watch (well, Ford's). <br /><br />BTW Jared, I was 10 years old when the Vietnam War ended. I really didn't spend any time "confiding" in it. I have an opinion about it, but,that would be another post entirely.<br /><br />May I suggest Dean Vernon Wormer for some good life advice.Jayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17870722050000888929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640715116021555600.post-63421527233169845222009-10-17T03:40:16.500-04:002009-10-17T03:40:16.500-04:00Jared - MN
I do not feel an obligation to comment...Jared - MN<br /><br />I do not feel an obligation to comment on the summation of your topics, because there is far too much, and I am too drunk.<br /><br />However, one statement caught me, and I feel obligated to respond.<br /><br />The comment: "Personally, I think the loss of 30 million future citizens is a form of genocide that the “choice” movement will some day regret." <br /><br />Guess what, 30 million deaths, which are essentially confirmed liberal deaths, are in your favor. Old people, generally conservative, will vote in kind, but the abortions of the left-wing, had they survived, would likely share their parent's ideology. Therefore, it would be a tremendous challenge to republicans had they lived, and please don't claim to have any sympathetic interest in life, because as a republican, you not only support the death penalty, but also have been confiding in wars that have no validity towards public safety or insurance of freedom. (I.e. Nixon's proclamation that he would rather sustain Vietnam involvement to save face, rather than accepting a negative indictment for both constituents and the judgemental left-wing) Additionally, don't begin assess operation Iraqi Freedom, which had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD's, it was a quintessentially ideological war, meaning Bush was opposed to powerful anti-christian nations, Iraq being tantamount of them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com